A comparison of discharge hydrograph using some methods of effective rainfall approach (case study: Upper Cisadane Watershed)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Abood MM, Mohammed TA, Ghazali AH, Mahmud AR, Sidek LM. 2012. Impact of Infiltration Methods on the Accuracy of Rainfall-Runoff Simulation. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4(12): 1708-1713.
Asdak Chay. 2014. Hidrologi dan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Yogyakarta (ID): Gajah Mada University Press.
Chu X, ASCE A M dan Steinman A. 2009. Event and Continuous Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS. J Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 135 (1) : 119-124.
Emilda A. 2010. Dampak Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap Respon Hidrologi DAS Cisadane Hulu. Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Maca P. 2003. Movement of Rainfall Events in Prague Area. J Hydrol Hydromech 51(2): 144149.
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models. Part IA discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10 (3): 282290.
Nilda. 2014. Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Dampaknya terhadap Hasil Air di Daerah Aliran Sungai Cisadane Hulu. Thesis. Denpasar (ID): Universitas Udayana.
Petra KC. 2011. Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering. Oxford (UK): Alpha Science International Ltd.
Rawls WJ, Shalaby A, Mc Cuen RH. 1981. Evaluation of Methods for Determining Urban Runoff Curve Numbers. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24 (6): 1562-1566.
Risyanto. 2007. Aplikasi HEC-HMS untuk Perkiraan Hidrograf Aliran di DAS Ciliwung Bagian Hulu. Skripsi. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Saleh A, Ghobad R dan Noredin R. 2011. Evaluation of HEC-HMS Methods in Surface Runoff Simulation (Case study: Kan watershed, Iran). Adv Environ Biol 5(6): 1316-1321.
Sardoii ER, Noredin R, Shahram KS dan Somaieh T. 2012. Calibration of Loss Estimation Methods in HEC-HMS for Simulation of Surface Runoff (Case Study: Amirkabir Dam Watershed, Iran). Adv Environ Biol 6(1): 343-348.
Setioputro S. 2016. Identifikasi kualitas Sub Das Cisadane Hulu dengan Parameter Perubahan Tutupan Lahan dan Debit Air. Skripsi. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Shaw EM, Beven KJ, Chappell NA dan Lamb R. 2011. Hydrology in Practice. New York (US): Spon Press.
raj M, Dirnbek L dan Brilly M. 2010. The Influence of Effective Rainfall on Modeled Runoff Hydrograph. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(1): 314.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. 1994. Engineering and Design Flood-Runoff Analysis: Engineer Manual. 1110-2-1417 [internet]. [diunduh 2 Februari 2016]. url: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. 2000. HEC-HMS Hydrologic Modelling System: Users Manual. Version 4.0. [internet]. [diunduh 2 Februari 2016]. Tersedia pada: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms.
USDA-Soil Conservation Service. 1985. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4. Washington D C (US): Natural Resources Conservation Services.
USDA-Soil Conservation Service. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watershed. Washington D C (US): Natural Resources Conservation Services.
Viessman W. 1977. Introduction to Hydrology 3rd edition. New York (US): Harper & Row.
Viji1 R, Ilangovan R dan Prasanna PR. 2015. Green-Ampt Runoff Model for the Ungauged Kundahpallam Watershed, Nilgiris, Western Ghats of India. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 10 (51).
Zema DA, Antonino L, Domenico M dan Santo MZ. 2016. Comparing Different Infiltration Methods of the HEC-HMS Model: The Case Study of the Msima Torrent (Southern Italy). Land Degrad Develop.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32679/jsda.v12i2.65
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 JURNAL SUMBER DAYA AIR
